Skip to main content

A programmers toolbox

Programmers are artisans.  We are masters of tools... or at least should be.

I see many programmers fail to focus on their tools.  The programmer himself is the most important part of the equation right?  Well, yes, but that doesn't mean tools cannot amplify his or her abilities.

Even the worlds greatest carpenter will be hampered with substandard tools.

There are a set of common tools that every developer should be familiar with.  I am going to focus on C/C++ Unix development but this list is easily translated into other environments.

1. Your editor.
This is where you are going to spend most of your time.  On Linux you have a many choices but every developer should know one of Emacs or Vi.  I'm an Emacs guy so I won't talk about Vi much, and besides... there is nothing your OS can do that my Emacs can't. :)

Editors are highly sophisticated programs with huge arrays of features.  The better you are at running your editor the more time you will save yourself in the long run.

2. Your shell.
Ever time you interact with your OS you are using a shell.  A little bit of shell script can save you hours.  Currently the most popular Unix shell is Bash.  Therefore that's the one we will use.  Bash includes a complete programming language which is perfect for automating systems tasks.

3. Your OS.
If you don't know your operating system them you are really just flailing in the dark hoping things will work the way you expect.  Knowledge of your operating system will help you work faster and help you understand how your code interacts with the underlying hardware.

4. Your language.
A language is more than just syntax.
In addition to its syntax a language has a system of tools, libraries, patterns, and idioms all designed to work together.

Taking C++ for example:
Tools include compilers, debuggers, profilers, static and dynamic analysis, documentation generators, and editors.

Libraries include the C standard library, C++ standard library, standard template library, and boost to name a few.

For patterns and idioms we have a stack of literature which will help you write code which does things the way other developers expect them to be done.  (please refer to Star Trek for an example of communicating in a common language but with no shared idioms)

I firmly believe that no time spent learning these things can be considered wasted.  Even a little bit of extra knowledge in one of these areas can often save hours of work.

We are going to walk through linux from scratch which is the quickest and most thorough way I know to learn how the Linux operating system was put together.  I'll attempt to run the whole process in a virtual machine so that we don't need to wipe out a disk partition.  Hopefully I don't come to regret that decision.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Duck typing considered harmful.

I've had a chance to work on a fairly large chunk of Python at this point and have decided that Python (like Perl) is completely untenable at scale.  <rant><rave><drool>  but wait!  I have reasons! Programmers spend most of their time reading code.  We read massive amounts of code.  After we read massive amounts of code we write one... or change one... To make a change to a piece of code you first have to understand what it does and how it interacts with the system around it.  Then we start reading massive amounts of code again.  Anything you can do to minimize the amount of code a programmer has to understand to make a change becomes a huge gain in productivity. Duck typing causes the amount of code you need to read to make a change to grow very large. For example lets look at two functions, one in C++ and one in Python. First in C++ int function(type1 arg1, type2 arg2) {   return arg1->method(arg2); } In this fun...

Microprocessor Architectures in the top500 list.

The  top500 list has been swamped by x86 machines over the last several years.  Anyone who knows me is aware that I am NO fan of the x86 ISA. Somewhat heartening is that the most recent list seen a resurgence in other architectures.  The Power architecture from IBM has been a fixture on the list for a long and is still a strong contender even though it has fallen to No. 12 from No. 9 last time and No. 1 in November of 2007. A Sparc machine has captured the No. 1 place this year and is actually as powerful as the the No. 2 through No. 6 systems combined. The Chinese MIPS based Loongson processor is starting to make some noise and the Dawning 6000 is reported to eventually reach a Petaflop in computing power. One other note is that an increasing number of machines in the top500 list rely heavily on GPUs.  The No. 2 machine on the current list, the Chinese Tianhe-1a machine, is comprised of 14,336 Intel Xeon processors and 7,168 Nvidia Tesla GPUs. Now ...

Staking Claims: A History of Programming Language Design Claims and Evidence

Found on  Lambda the Ultimate  ( a great programming languages blog btw ) A great article  on programming languages through history and the truth of their claims. From the article: While still a relatively young field, computer science has a vast body of knowledge in the domain of programming languages. When a new language is introduced, its designers make claims which distinguish their language from previous languages. However, it often feels like language designers do not feel a pressing need to back these claims with evidence beyond personal anecdotes. Peer reviewers are likely to agree. In this paper, we present preliminary work which revisits the history of such claims by examining a number of language design papers which span the history of programming language development. We focus on the issue of claim-evidence correspondence, or determining how often claims are or are not backed by evidence. These preliminary results confirm that unsupported claims have been ...